State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Johnson

1917 OK CR 219, 167 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 681, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 203
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided October 16, 1917·No. No. A-2095.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to prohibit the county court of Pottawatomie county and Hal Johnson, as judge thereof, from proceeding further on’ the trial of an information filed in said court wherein the petitioner is charged with unlawfully practicing dentistry. Attached to said petition is a copy of an alternative writ of mandamus, issued out of the superior court of Oklahoma county, Edward Dewes Oldfield,' Judge, and directed to the Oklahoma *682 State Dental Board, to show cause why they should not*issue a certificate to the said O. R. Roberts upon his application, upon the ground that he was entitled to the same under the Constitution of Oklahoma as a practicing dentist in the Territory of Oklahoma prior to the admission of Oklahoma into the Union as a state, and a further order that said C. R. Roberts might practice dentistry in the State of Oklahoma until the further order of said court. Upon the filing" of the petition an alternative writ of prohibition was issued. To this respondent duly answered. No further appearance having been made on behalf of the petitioner, it is ordered that the alternative writ of prohibition issued herein be vacated and set aside; and it is further ordered that the cause be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Johnson, 1917 OK CR 219, 167 P. 1182, 14 Okla. Crim. 681, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 203 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

1917 OK CR 219 (State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.