State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 2014 Ohio 2112 (State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm., 139 Ohio St.3d 185, 2014-Ohio-2112.]
THE STATE EX REL. ROBERTS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm., 139 Ohio St.3d 185, 2014-Ohio-2112.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2013-0349—Submitted April 29, 2014—Decided May 21, 2014.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 12AP-298, 2013-Ohio-287. ____________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court of appeals. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. ____________________ Agee, Clymer, Mitchell & Laret and Robert M. Robinson, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Latawanda N. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. _________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 2112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-roberts-v-indus-comm-ohio-2014.