State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm., 139 Ohio St.3d 185, 2014-Ohio-2112.]
THE STATE EX REL. ROBERTS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm., 139 Ohio St.3d 185, 2014-Ohio-2112.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 2013-0349—Submitted April 29, 2014—Decided May 21, 2014.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 12AP-298, 2013-Ohio-287. ____________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court of appeals. O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. ____________________ Agee, Clymer, Mitchell & Laret and Robert M. Robinson, for appellant. Michael DeWine, Attorney General, and Latawanda N. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio. _________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2014 Ohio 2112 (State ex rel. Roberts v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.