State ex rel. Roberts v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Roberts v. Henderson

253 So. 2d 218, 259 La. 888, 1971 La. LEXIS 3996

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 18, 1971

DocketNo. 51811

StatusPublished

This text of 253 So. 2d 218 (State ex rel. Roberts v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Roberts v. Henderson, 253 So. 2d 218, 259 La. 888, 1971 La. LEXIS 3996 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinions

In re: Herbert Roberts applying for writ of habeas corpus and certiorari.

Writ denied. In view of the reasons for judgment of the trial court, the showing made is insufficient for the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction. Cf., McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90-S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970).

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that an evidentiary hearing is required and assigns written reasons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Herbert Roberts applying for writ of habeas corpus and certiorari.

Writ denied. In view of the reasons for judgment of the trial court, the showing made is insufficient for the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction. Cf., McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 90-S.Ct. 1441, 25 L.Ed.2d 763 (1970).

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion that an evidentiary hearing is required and assigns written reasons.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 So. 2d 218, 259 La. 888, 1971 La. LEXIS 3996, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-roberts-v-henderson-la-1971.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack