State ex rel. Roach v. Falkenheiner

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Roach v. Falkenheiner

531 So. 2d 280, 1988 La. LEXIS 2448, 1988 WL 102503

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 4, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KH-2408

StatusPublished

This text of 531 So. 2d 280 (State ex rel. Roach v. Falkenheiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Roach v. Falkenheiner, 531 So. 2d 280, 1988 La. LEXIS 2448, 1988 WL 102503 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Roach, Pauline; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory, remedial and mandamus writs; Parish of Concordia, 7th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 80-1364.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion she has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Roach, Pauline; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory, remedial and mandamus writs; Parish of Concordia, 7th Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 80-1364.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion she has filed for production of documents. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

531 So. 2d 280, 1988 La. LEXIS 2448, 1988 WL 102503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-roach-v-falkenheiner-la-1988.