State ex rel. RMI Titanium Co. v. Indus. Comm.
This text of 1998 Ohio 15 (State ex rel. RMI Titanium Co. v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 546.]
THE STATE EX REL. RMI TITANIUM COMPANY, APPELLEE, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO; WILLIAMS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State ex rel. RMI Titanium Co. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-15.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and Industrial Commission’s order reinstated. (No. 98-96—Submitted September 15, 1998—Decided November 10, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 97APD08-1043. __________________ Jane P. Wilson & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Jane P. Wilson, for appellee. Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Slipski and Steven L. Paulson, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. MOYER, C.J., COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., dissent. __________________ LUNDBERG STRATTON, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1998 Ohio 15, 83 Ohio St. 3d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rmi-titanium-co-v-indus-comm-ohio-1998.