State Ex Rel. Rives v. Halley

1934 OK 186, 30 P.2d 915, 167 Okla. 504, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 593
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 20, 1934·No. 25252·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OSBORN, J.

In this case the plaintiff, Claude G. Rives, Jr., seeks a writ of mandamus against the defendant, Harry L. S. Halley, district judge of the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., to compel him to direct a receiver appointed by him to return and surrender to plaintiff certain property taken into possession under the order of the court.

It is pointed out that an appeal was taken from the order of the trial court refusing to vacate the appointment of a receiver by plaintiff • in another action, and that plaintiff executed a bond, and by virtue of section 780, O. S. 1931, the receiver should be forced to deliver possession of the property to plaintiff pending the appeal.

The said appeal is styled Claude G. Rives. Jr., Trustee, v. Mincks Hotel Co. et al., No. 25124, 167 Okla. 500, 30 P. (2d) 911. and was this day decided by this court. Thereupon the issue presented became moot, and the action is dismissed.

RILEX, O. J., CULLISON, Y. C. J., and McNEILL and BUSBY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Rives v. Halley, 1934 OK 186, 30 P.2d 915, 167 Okla. 504, 1934 Okla. LEXIS 593 (Okla. 1934).

1934 OK 186 (State Ex Rel. Rives v. Halley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Epple v. Taylor
1950 OK 243 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1950)
Bonney v. Smith
1942 OK 420 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1942)