State ex rel. River King, Inc. v. Calvin

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. River King, Inc. v. Calvin

11 S.W.3d 602, 2000 Mo. LEXIS 17, 2000 WL 199275

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedFebruary 22, 2000

DocketNo. SC 81847

StatusPublished

This text of 11 S.W.3d 602 (State ex rel. River King, Inc. v. Calvin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. River King, Inc. v. Calvin, 11 S.W.3d 602, 2000 Mo. LEXIS 17, 2000 WL 199275 (Mo. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

River King is a defendant in the underlying action filed in the circuit court of St. Louis City. It timely filed a motion, Rule 55.27(a), to dismiss the action or transfer the case to a county having proper venue. After holding a hearing on the motion, it was overruled. River King subsequently filed a motion to reconsider, which was supported by additional material. This motion also was overruled. River King then sought a writ of mandamus, and this Court’s alternative writ issued. The alternative writ, superseded by this opinion, is hereby quashed.

The record in this case establishes that the underlying cause is filed in the circuit court of the wrong venue. The Circuit Court of St. Louis City is directed to transfer the case as provided by section 476.410, RSMo 1994.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

River King is a defendant in the underlying action filed in the circuit court of St. Louis City. It timely filed a motion, Rule 55.27(a), to dismiss the action or transfer the case to a county having proper venue. After holding a hearing on the motion, it was overruled. River King subsequently filed a motion to reconsider, which was supported by additional material. This motion also was overruled. River King then sought a writ of mandamus, and this Court’s alternative writ issued. The alternative writ, superseded by this opinion, is hereby quashed.

The record in this case establishes that the underlying cause is filed in the circuit court of the wrong venue. The Circuit Court of St. Louis City is directed to transfer the case as provided by section 476.410, RSMo 1994.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 S.W.3d 602, 2000 Mo. LEXIS 17, 2000 WL 199275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-river-king-inc-v-calvin-mo-2000.