State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims
This text of 2010 Ohio 3233 (State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of Daniel L. Rittner from an order denying his motion for leave to file an objection without service on opposing counsel in the underlying mandamus case. The order appealed from is not a final, appealable order. See R.C. 2505.02; State ex rel. Downs v. Panioto, 107 Ohio St.3d 347, 2006-Ohio-8, 839 N.E.2d 911, ¶ 17 (“R.C. 2505.03 restricts the appellate jurisdiction of this court to the review of final orders, judgments, or decrees”).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2010 Ohio 3233, 126 Ohio St. 3d 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rittner-v-court-of-claims-ohio-2010.