State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims

2010 Ohio 3233, 126 Ohio St. 3d 108

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 14, 2010·No. 2010-0386·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of Daniel L. Rittner from an order denying his motion for leave to file an objection without service on opposing counsel in the underlying mandamus case. The order appealed from is not a final, appealable order. See R.C. 2505.02; State ex rel. Downs v. Panioto, 107 Ohio St.3d 347, 2006-Ohio-8, 839 N.E.2d 911, ¶ 17 (“R.C. 2505.03 restricts the appellate jurisdiction of this court to the review of final orders, judgments, or decrees”).

Appeal dismissed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We dismiss the appeal of Daniel L. Rittner from an order denying his motion for leave to file an objection without service on opposing counsel in the underlying mandamus case. The order appealed from is not a final, appealable order. See R.C. 2505.02; State ex rel. Downs v. Panioto, 107 Ohio St.3d 347, 2006-Ohio-8, 839 N.E.2d 911, ¶ 17 (“R.C. 2505.03 restricts the appellate jurisdiction of this court to the review of final orders, judgments, or decrees”).

Appeal dismissed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims, 2010 Ohio 3233, 126 Ohio St. 3d 108 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

2010 Ohio 3233 (State ex rel. Rittner v. Court of Claims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related