State Ex. Rel. Richey v. Sup. Ct. for King Cty.

371 P.2d 51, 59 Wash. 2d 872, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 477
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMay 4, 1962
Docket36427
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 371 P.2d 51 (State Ex. Rel. Richey v. Sup. Ct. for King Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex. Rel. Richey v. Sup. Ct. for King Cty., 371 P.2d 51, 59 Wash. 2d 872, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 477 (Wash. 1962).

Opinion

Ott, J.

Anthony Reese was bom on December 30, 1948. When he was four years of age, his parents, Jewel and Lena Reese, abandoned him. February 10, 1958, he was adjudicated a ward of the Juvenile Court for King County, and placed in the custody of the Department of Public Assistance to arrange for his care. The department placed Anthony in a foster home operated by Woodrow Richey and Ioleene Richey, his wife. He remained there until he was taken to Harborview Hospital by Frances Lofgren, of the department, on May 17, 1961. On the same day, Frances Lofgren filed an application in the Superior Court for King County, in which she alleged that Anthony Reese (then twelve years of age) was a mentally ill person and should be apprehended and detained as such.

The superior court, as authorized by RCW 71.02.120, ordered Anthony detained at the hospital and fixed the time and place for a hearing on the application at 10:00 a. m., May 18, 1961, at Harborview Hospital in Seattle. Anthony Reese being a ward of the state, the following notice of hearing upon the application was directed to him and to the King County Juvenile Court:

“You are hereby notified that an application, a copy of which accompanies this notice, has been filed in the Superior Court of King County, Washington, by Frances Lofgren on May 17, 1961, alleging that Anthony Reese, who is being detained at King County Hospital, is mentally ill and should be hospitalized. The alleged mentally ill person, and the guardian, relatives or friends of such person, have the right to appear before the Court to make reply to this allegation, and to summon or produce witnesses and evidence as desired.
*874 “The alleged mentally ill person, or such person’s guardian, attorney or guardian ad litem, has the right, before or at the commencement of the hearing upon said application, to demand a trial by jury; a demand for jury trial shall be in writing, filed with the Court, and accompanied by a jury fee of-$12.00. The alleged mentally ill person also has the right to be represented by an attorney.
“You are further hereby advised that the hearing upon the above described application has been set for the 18th day of May, 1961, at the hour of 10:00 (a. m.) in the court room at King County Hospital, King County, Washington.
“Dated this 17th day of May, 1961.”

At the hearing before a Court Commissioner, Drs. John B. Riley and Jack J. Klein, who had been appointed by the court to examine Anthony Reese, testified relative to their examination and conclusion that he was mentally ill and should be hospitalized at Western State Hospital. The order of hospitalization was entered May 18, 1961. Anthony Reese has been treated and cared for at Western State Hospital since that time.

June 6, 1961, Woodrow Richey and Ioleene Richey, individually, and on behalf of Anthony Reese, a minor, appeared specially and moved to quash the order of commitment. The affidavit in support of the motion alleged that the proceeding in which Anthony Reese was adjudicated a mentally ill person was irregular and void for the reason that no guardian ad litem or attorney had been appointed to represent the minor at the hearing.

Upon stipulation of counsel, an agreed order was entered June 23, 1961, that the issues raised by the motion could be heard by the judge of the Juvenile Court for King County, and the cause was, by order, transferred to the juvenile court. Thereafter, the juvenile court appointed Ioleene Richey as guardian ad litem for Anthony Reese and authorized her to appear and represent the minor in all matters. The guardian ad litem moved the court to reconsider the memorandum decision by which the adjudication of Anthony Reese as a mentally ill person was sustained. The motion for reconsideration was granted and, at the hearing on February 8, 1962, Ioleene Richey and Frances Lofgren *875 testified. At the conclusion of the hearing, the court entered the following order:

“This matter came on regularly for hearing before the undersigned judge of the above-entitled court upon a Special Appearance and Motion to Quash, and also on a Motion to Vacate the Judgment. The moving parties are Ioleene Richey as Guardian ad Litem for Anthony Reese, a minor, and Woodrow Richey and Ioleene Richey, acting individually and on behalf of Anthony Reese, a minor.
“On the 8th day of February, 1962, this court heard the foregoing motions, together with testimony of Anthony Reese, Ioleene Reese [Richey] and Frances Lofgren, a social worker in the Welfare Department of the State of Washington. The court finds the following:
“That Anthony Reese is now 12 years of age. Several years ago he was made a ward of Juvenile Court of King County, and was placed in the temporary custody of the Welfare Department of the State of Washington. In September of 1957, Anthony Reese was placed by the Welfare Department with Woodrow Richey and Ioleene Richey, his wife, on a foster-home basis. He remained the ward of the court. On May 17, 1961, this commitment proceeding was instituted, and in the afternoon of May 17, 1961, Anthony Reese was taken from the Richey home to the Har-borview Hospital. A mental illness hearing was scheduled for the next day at 10:00 o’clock A. M. Frances Lofgren, the social worker, at the time of taking Anthony Reese from the Richey home, told the Richeys that there would be this hearing the next morning. The Richeys asked Mrs. Lofgren if they could be present at the hearing. Frances Lofgren told the Richeys that they could not attend the hearing. No notice of a hearing was served on the Richeys. The hearing was held at the Harborview Hospital at about 10:00 o’clock A. M. on May 18, 1961. No Guardian ad Litem was appointed for Anthony Reese, nor at that time was he represented by an attorney. On the 18th day of May, 1961, a judgment and order of commitment was entered and Anthony Reese was then committed and sent to the Western State Hospital at Steilacoom, Washington, where he has been ever since and is now.
“On the 11th day of December, 1961, this court filed herein its Memorandum Decision denying the Richeys and Anthony Reese any relief. Thereafter, on the 8th day of February, 1962, the court appointed Ioleene Richey as Guardian ad Litem for Anthony Reese, and authorized her to rep *876 resent Anthony Reese in all matters herein. Thereupon, a Motion for Reconsideration was filed herein and granted by this court. Ioleene Richey, as Guardian ad Litem for Anthony Reese, and Woodrow Richey and Ioleene Richey, individually, and on behalf of Anthony Reese, a minor, did again urge the granting of the motions as made herein. The court having fully considered the matter and being fully advised, now, therefore,
“It Is Ordered that the Special Appearance and Motion to Quash and Motion to Vacate the Judgment as made by Ioleene Richey, as Guardian ad Litem of Anthony Reese, a minor, and by Woodrow Richey and Ioleene Richey, his wife, individually, and on behalf of Anthony Reese, a minor, be and the same are denied.

“Done in open court this 8th day of Feb.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. Department of Social & Health Services
151 Wash. 2d 331 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
Guardianship Estate of Keffeler v. STATE, DSHS
88 P.3d 949 (Washington Supreme Court, 2004)
Eldredge v. Kamp Kachess Youth Services, Inc.
583 P.2d 626 (Washington Supreme Court, 1978)
Quesnell v. State
517 P.2d 568 (Washington Supreme Court, 1974)
In Re Levias
517 P.2d 588 (Washington Supreme Court, 1973)
Nesbitt v. Nesbitt
402 P.2d 228 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 P.2d 51, 59 Wash. 2d 872, 1962 Wash. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-richey-v-sup-ct-for-king-cty-wash-1962.