State ex rel. Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Richardson v. State

538 So. 2d 622, 1989 La. LEXIS 618, 1989 WL 19944

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 8, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-0121

StatusPublished

This text of 538 So. 2d 622 (State ex rel. Richardson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Richardson v. State, 538 So. 2d 622, 1989 La. LEXIS 618, 1989 WL 19944 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Richardson, David; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 2134.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timley on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief via certified mail on or about December 7, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Richardson, David; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of mandamus and supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “B”, No. 2134.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timley on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief via certified mail on or about December 7, 1988. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

538 So. 2d 622, 1989 La. LEXIS 618, 1989 WL 19944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-richardson-v-state-la-1989.