State Ex Rel. Richard v. Cleveland Metro Health Center

616 N.E.2d 549, 84 Ohio App. 3d 142, 1992 Ohio App. LEXIS 6819
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 2, 1992
DocketNo. 63526.
StatusPublished

This text of 616 N.E.2d 549 (State Ex Rel. Richard v. Cleveland Metro Health Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Richard v. Cleveland Metro Health Center, 616 N.E.2d 549, 84 Ohio App. 3d 142, 1992 Ohio App. LEXIS 6819 (Ohio Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

Ann McManamon, Judge.

Relator requests that this court compel respondent Cleveland Metro Health Center (“the hospital”) to provide him with the following described records:

*143 “certified copy of the emergency room report and/or the report for the Emergency Medical Service who transported Neil S. Baldwin, to Metro Hospital on 1/25/87 at approximately 1:30 a.m. from 4515 Clark Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio for gunshot injury. * * * THIS IS NOT A REQUEST FOR MEDICAL RECORDS, ONLY GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF INJURY AND DESCRIPTION OF PATIENT. PLEASE INCLUDE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF BULLETS REMOVED AND NOT REMOVED BY YOUR HOSPITAL.” (Capitalization in original.)

The hospital has filed five sets of copies of records for individualized scrutiny. A review of these records reflects that, on January 25,1987, Cleveland Emergency Medical Service (“EMS”) transported Baldwin to the hospital where he arrived at 1:35 a.m. Both the emergency room report and the report by the EMS team which transported Neil S. Baldwin to the hospital were generated while Baldwin was alive.

The hospital contends that these documents are medical records.

“A medical record is ‘any document or combination of documents, except births, deaths, and the fact of admission to or discharge from a hospital, that pertains to the medical history, diagnosis, prognosis, or medical condition of a patient and that is generated and maintained in the process of medical treatment.’ R.C. 149.43(A)(3). Record III — 12 is the five-page Mt. Sinai Hospital Emergency Room Record of Alfred McClairin, which depicts his medical condition and treatment and is therefore excepted from disclosure. Records X — 31-32 are Emergency Medical Service’s run sheets indicating barely legible medical conditions and treatment, which also are exempted from disclosure.” State ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co. v. Cleveland (1992), 82 Ohio App.3d 202, 214, 611 N.E.2d 838, 845-846.

We have conducted the requisite in camera inspection and individualized scrutiny of the emergency room and designated EMS reports. We are compelled to hold that the hospital has properly refused to release the reports relator seeks because they are medical records.

Accordingly, relator’s request for relief in mandamus is denied. Relator to pay costs.

Writ denied.

John F. Corrigan and Patton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of Cleveland
611 N.E.2d 838 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 N.E.2d 549, 84 Ohio App. 3d 142, 1992 Ohio App. LEXIS 6819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-richard-v-cleveland-metro-health-center-ohioctapp-1992.