State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 5, 1961

DocketNo. 36857

StatusPublished

This text of 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Ohio 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record, this court is of the opinion that the Court of Appeals was warranted in allowing the writ for the reasons stated in its journal entry. Curtiss v. City of Cleveland, 170 Ohio St., 127.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radclife and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record, this court is of the opinion that the Court of Appeals was warranted in allowing the writ for the reasons stated in its journal entry. Curtiss v. City of Cleveland, 170 Ohio St., 127.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radclife and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rice-v-village-of-woodmere-ohio-1961.