State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 5, 1961·No. No. 36857·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record, this court is of the opinion that the Court of Appeals was warranted in allowing the writ for the reasons stated in its journal entry. Curtiss v. City of Cleveland, 170 Ohio St., 127.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radclife and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

From an examination of the record, this court is of the opinion that the Court of Appeals was warranted in allowing the writ for the reasons stated in its journal entry. Curtiss v. City of Cleveland, 170 Ohio St., 127.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Radclife and O’Neill, JJ., concur. Radcliee, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Herbert, J.

State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere, 172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (Ohio 1961).

Pincite

172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 359 (State ex rel. Rice v. Village of Woodmere) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.