State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros

2019 Ohio 626
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 20, 2019
DocketL-19-1015
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 Ohio 626 (State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros, 2019 Ohio 626 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros, 2019-Ohio-626.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LUCAS COUNTY

State of Ohio, ex rel. André D. Rice Court of Appeals No. L-19-1015

Relator

v.

Honorable Judge Dean P. Mandros DECISION AND JUDGMENT

Respondent Decided: February 20, 2019

*****

André D. Rice, pro se.

SINGER, J.

{¶ 1} Relator, André D. Rice, an inmate at the Trumbull Correctional Institution in

Trumbull County, Ohio, has petitioned for a writ of procedendo, requesting this court to

compel the trial court to make a ruling on his April 17, 2018 “post-conviction motion for

allied offenses merger resentencing.” {¶ 2} “Procedendo is an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to one of

inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment.” State ex rel. Draper v. State, 10th Dist.

Franklin No. 07AP-357, 2007-Ohio-5581, ¶ 17, citing State ex rel. Sherrills v. Cuyahoga

Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 72 Ohio St.3d 461, 462, 650 N.E.2d 899 (1995). “The writ

does not in any case attempt to control the inferior court as to what that judgment might

be.” Id. “A writ of procedendo is appropriate when a court has either refused to render a

judgment or has unnecessarily delayed proceeding to judgment.” Id.

{¶ 3} R.C. 2969.25 provides that, at the time of petitioning for a writ of

procedendo, an inmate must “file with the court an affidavit that contains a description of

each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five

years in any state or federal court.” See Draper at ¶ 2-4 (dismissing because of failure to

comply with R.C. 2969.25).

{¶ 4} Here, we find relator failed to submit an affidavit as to prior actions.

{¶ 5} Accordingly, and based on the foregoing ground, we decline to issue the writ

and the petition is not well-taken and is denied. Relator is ordered to pay the costs of this

action. The clerk is directed to serve the parties with notice of this judgment and its date

of entry on the journal pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B).

Writ denied.

2. State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros C.A. No. L-19-1015

Mark L. Pietrykowski, J. _______________________________ JUDGE Arlene Singer, J. _______________________________ Thomas J. Osowik, J. JUDGE CONCUR. _______________________________ JUDGE

This decision is subject to further editing by the Supreme Court of Ohio’s Reporter of Decisions. Parties interested in viewing the final reported version are advised to visit the Ohio Supreme Court’s web site at: http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/ROD/docs/.

3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Draper v. State, Unpublished Decision (10-16-2007)
2007 Ohio 5581 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
State ex rel. Sherrills v. Court of Common Pleas
650 N.E.2d 899 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 Ohio 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rice-v-mandros-ohioctapp-2019.