State ex rel. Rhodes v. Van Brocklin

522 N.E.2d 1088, 36 Ohio St. 3d 236, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 128
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMay 11, 1988
DocketNo. 88-17
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 522 N.E.2d 1088 (State ex rel. Rhodes v. Van Brocklin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Rhodes v. Van Brocklin, 522 N.E.2d 1088, 36 Ohio St. 3d 236, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 128 (Ohio 1988).

Opinion

On the basis that appellant has an adequate remedy at law, the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint in mandamus (case No. 87 CA 176) is affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
522 N.E.2d 1088, 36 Ohio St. 3d 236, 1988 Ohio LEXIS 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rhodes-v-van-brocklin-ohio-1988.