State ex rel. Rhoad v. Groff

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rhoad v. Groff

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 72

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 18, 1959·No. No. 36127·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case has been submitted on respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the questions raised are moot. It appearing that relators have been permitted to make and have made inspection of various public books and public records of the board, they have received the relief prayed for in their petition and the questions raised have become moot. Therefore, the motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal is dismissed on authority of Minor v. Witt, City Clerk, 82 Ohio St., 237, 92 N. E., 21.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The case has been submitted on respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the questions raised are moot. It appearing that relators have been permitted to make and have made inspection of various public books and public records of the board, they have received the relief prayed for in their petition and the questions raised have become moot. Therefore, the motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal is dismissed on authority of Minor v. Witt, City Clerk, 82 Ohio St., 237, 92 N. E., 21.

Appeal dismissed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Rhoad v. Groff, 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 72 (Ohio 1959).

Pincite

170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 72 (State ex rel. Rhoad v. Groff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.