State ex rel. Rhoad v. Groff
This text of 170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 72 (State ex rel. Rhoad v. Groff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case has been submitted on respondents’ motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the questions raised are moot. It appearing that relators have been permitted to make and have made inspection of various public books and public records of the board, they have received the relief prayed for in their petition and the questions raised have become moot. Therefore, the motion to dismiss is sustained and the appeal is dismissed on authority of Minor v. Witt, City Clerk, 82 Ohio St., 237, 92 N. E., 21.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 Ohio St. (N.S.) 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rhoad-v-groff-ohio-1959.