State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Rickenbrode

4 S.W.2d 436, 319 Mo. 486, 1928 Mo. LEXIS 508
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedMarch 17, 1928
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 4 S.W.2d 436 (State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Rickenbrode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Rickenbrode, 4 S.W.2d 436, 319 Mo. 486, 1928 Mo. LEXIS 508 (Mo. 1928).

Opinion

*488 WHITE, J.

The suit is to enforce the State’s lien for taxes against the land of defendants situated in Consolidated School District Number Four, Livingston County. The amount claimed was $97.71, of ‘which $54.23 was school taxes. The defendants tendered $84.95, the amount they admitted to be due, which included $41.47 of school taxes, claiming that the balance of the school taxes assessed were contrary to the Constitution and the statutes relating to assessments for school purposes.

The school district had voted a levy of 100 cents on the one hundred dollars’ valuation, for school taxes. The defendants contended that under Section 11, Article X, of the Constitution, and Section 11123, Revised Statutes 1919, the limit which could be voted for taxes in the district was 65 cents on the hundred dollars valuation. The amount actually levied in pursuance of the vote was eighty-five cents on the hundred dollars. There is no Question raised on account of the actual levy being less than the vote which provided for one hundred cents.

Judgment was for the plaintiff in the amount sued for, and the defendants appealed.

I. The only question in the case is whether Consolidated School District Number Four could vote a tax in excess of 65 cents on the hundred dollars valuation. An agreed statement appears in the record, which shows that the district was legally org-anized as a Consolidated School District, in April 1916. The section of the. Constitution involved is Section 11, Article X, which contained this provision (the parts in italics were inserted by amendment in 1902) :

! 1 For school purposes in districts composed of cities which lime one hundred thousand inhabitants or more, the annual rate on property shall not exceed sixty cents on the hundred dollars valuation, and in other (districts forty cents on the hundred dollars valuation.
“Provided, the aforesaid annual rates for school purposes may be increased, in districts formed of cities and towns, to an amount .not to exceed one dollar on the hundred dollars valuation, and in other districts to an amount not to exceed sixty-five cents on the hundréd dollars valuation, on the condition that a majority of the voters who are taxpayers, voting at an election held to decide the question, vote for said increase.’’

*489 The argument of appellants is that this is not a district formed of a town; it is one of the “other districts” limited to a rate of sixty-five cents on the hundred dollars’ valuation. Then they point to Section 11123, Revised Statutes 1919, which classifies school districts of the State into four classes:

“First, all districts having only three directors shall be known as common school districts; second, all districts outside of incorporated cities, towns and villages which are governed by six directors shall be known as consolidated school districts; third, all districts governed by six directors in which is located any city of the fourth class, or any incorporated town or village, shall be' known as town school districts; and fourth, all districts in which is located any city of the first, second or third classes, shall be known as city school districts.”

The town of Avalon is situated in" the district, but is not incorporated. The district has six directors, and appellant claims that it comes therefore, within the second class, a consolidated school district; that this is a legislative interpretation of the Constitution which makes school districts formed of cities or towns apply only to towns which are incorporated.

It may be said that the general provision in Section 11, Article X, of the Constitution, left it open for the Legislature to classify school districts in such way as to bring appropriate classes within that provision of the Constitution relating to tax limit. And if that were all the legislation on the subject and the only fact in relation to the organization of the school district was that which occurred in 1916, appellant’s argument would possess some plausibility; but thát would involve a question not necessary to decide here.

ÍI. Evidence admitted over the objection of the defendants showed that the town of Avalon had two general stores, a grocery store, hardware store, Farmers’ Exchange, post office, two garages and a blacksmith shop; churches, a barber shop, high school and a bank. It had two hundred and fifty inhabitants. Prior to t]le year 1923, it had maintained a high school with a four years’ course, recognized by the State Superintendent. Defendant objected to this evidence on the ground that the town was not incorporated. The evidence'also showed that by an election held in 1898, the Avalon School District was voted a town school district with six directors. This was shown by a record of the Avalon School District proceedings. The only objection offered was that it was irrelevant. There was no objection on the ’ground that it was not sufficient evidence to establish the fact.

*490 Section 11123, Revised Statutes 1919, quoted above, was enacted in 1909, some eleven years after tbe district was organized as a town district, and the classification of that section could not affect the legality of such organization.

At that time Sections 11236 and 11237, Revised: Statutes 1919, were in force. They were enacted in 1895, and appeared in the Revised Statutes of 1909, in almost the same form as they appear in the Revised Statutes of 1919. Section 11236 provides that any common school district containing within its boundaries a city, town or village, a plat of which has been filed in the Recorder’s office- of the county in which the same is situated, or any district having two hundred or more children of school age, by the last enumeration, may be organized iiito a city or town school district.

Section 11237 provides the manner of the annual school meeting in which such organization shall be effected. The evidence shows that the plat of the town of Avalon was filed in the office of the Recorder of Deeds of Livingston County in November, 1870. Subsequently the plats of a number of additions to the town were filed in the Recorder’s office. These sections show an intention of the Legislature to provide for organization of school districts within the terms of the Constitution. ■ ■ . ! ;

In State ex rel. Buck v. Railroad, 263 Mo. 689, a suit to collect taxes voted beyond the sixty-five cent limit, the court construed the expression “formed of cities and towns” (1. c. 696). It was held that the expression did not mean that, the' district should be formed exclusively of cities or towns, bút it might include, contiguous territory outside the city limits. The opinion quotes what is now S'eetion 11236, providing that any city, town or village, the plat of which has been previously filed, etc., may be organized . . . nothing is said in the opinion about the necessity of the town being incorporated; and a judgment for taxes in excess of the sixty-five cents limit was affirmed.

In State ex rel. v. Gill, 190 Mo.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Vanlandingham v. Reorganized School Dist. No. R-IV
243 S.W.2d 107 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1951)
State Ex Rel. Brown v. Woods
61 S.W.2d 732 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 S.W.2d 436, 319 Mo. 486, 1928 Mo. LEXIS 508, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-reynolds-v-rickenbrode-mo-1928.