State ex rel. Retterer v. Marion Cty. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Retterer v. Marion Cty. Court of Common Pleas

693 N.E.2d 1089, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1403, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1387

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 11, 1998

Docket98-843

StatusPublished

This text of 693 N.E.2d 1089 (State ex rel. Retterer v. Marion Cty. Court of Common Pleas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Retterer v. Marion Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 693 N.E.2d 1089, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1403, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1387 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition.

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s emergency motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would deny the emergency motion for stay.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition.

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s emergency motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would deny the emergency motion for stay.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 N.E.2d 1089, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1403, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-retterer-v-marion-cty-court-of-common-pleas-ohio-1998.