State ex rel. Renfro v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services

553 N.E.2d 1052, 50 Ohio St. 3d 267, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 183
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Renfro v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services. Read the opinion of the Court — 54 Ohio St. 3d 25
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 25, 1990·No. No. 89-1121·Published

Opinions

In this original action, relators, Ralph A. and Diane Renfro, seek a writ of mandamus ordering respondent, the Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services, to produce for inspection certain records pertaining to the removal of a foster child from their custody. Respondent asserts, inter alia, that the records are excepted from the mandatory disclosure requirements of R.C. 149.43, the public records law, and relators have challenged that assertion. Accordingly, we hereby grant a limited writ directing respondent to submit the requested records to this court under seal for an in camera inspection, on the authority of State, ex rel. Natl. Broadcasting Co., v. Cleveland (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 79, 526 N.E. 2d 786, paragraph four of the syllabus.

Moyer, C.J., Gwin, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Holmes and Douglas, JJ., separately dissent. W. Scott Gwin, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for Sweeney, J. Holmes, J., dissenting. I would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Renfro v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services, 553 N.E.2d 1052, 50 Ohio St. 3d 267, 1990 Ohio LEXIS 183 (Ohio 1990).

553 N.E.2d 1052 (State ex rel. Renfro v. Cuyahoga County Department of Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of Cleveland
526 N.E.2d 786 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
State ex rel. Polovischak v. Mayfield
552 N.E.2d 635 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)