State ex rel. Reitzel Estate, Inc. v. Ostermann

135 A. 924, 5 N.J. Misc. 208, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 333
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 28, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 135 A. 924 (State ex rel. Reitzel Estate, Inc. v. Ostermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Reitzel Estate, Inc. v. Ostermann, 135 A. 924, 5 N.J. Misc. 208, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 333 (N.J. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a zoning case. In the stipulation of facts it appears that the relator was the owner of property in Maplewood, on which stood a one-family house. He applied for a permit to convert the same into a two-family house according to .certain plans and specifications. The building inspector declined to issue the permit for the erection and alterations of the building solely because a zoning ordinance of the township of Maplewood zoned the property in question as a single-family residence district.

Of course, under the authority of State v. Nutley, 99 N. J. L. 389, a peremptory writ should issue, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
135 A. 924, 5 N.J. Misc. 208, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-reitzel-estate-inc-v-ostermann-nj-1927.