State ex rel. Reeves v. Vannoy
This text of 209 So. 3d 87 (State ex rel. Reeves v. Vannoy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
h Denied. Relator shows no abuse of discretion in the district court’s decision to deny his request to further supplement his application for post-conviction relief. See State ex rel. Duhon v. Whitley, 92-1740 (La. 9/2/94), 642 So.2d 1273 (district court has discretion to decide whether to allow a post-conviction petitioner to amend or supplement a timely-filed application for post-conviction relief); cf. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4(E). Within 90 days of this order, the district court is ordered to rule on all of relator’s now pending claims. See State v. Reeves, 15-1668 (La. 4/4/16), 188 So.3d 257.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
209 So. 3d 87, 2017 WL 344374, 2017 La. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-reeves-v-vannoy-la-2017.