State ex rel. Reese v. Tuscarawas County Board of Elections

215 N.E.2d 698, 6 Ohio St. 2d 66, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 84, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 339
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 8, 1966
DocketNo. 40075
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 215 N.E.2d 698 (State ex rel. Reese v. Tuscarawas County Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Reese v. Tuscarawas County Board of Elections, 215 N.E.2d 698, 6 Ohio St. 2d 66, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 84, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 339 (Ohio 1966).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator has failed to comply with statutory requirements as to his petition for candidate. The action of the board of elections in rejecting the petition was not an abuse of discretion or contrary to law. The writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Schmelzer v. Board of Elections
440 N.E.2d 801 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1982)
State ex rel. Loss v. Board of Elections
281 N.E.2d 186 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
State ex rel. Wolson v. Kelly
215 N.E.2d 719 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
215 N.E.2d 698, 6 Ohio St. 2d 66, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 84, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-reese-v-tuscarawas-county-board-of-elections-ohio-1966.