State ex rel. Reese v. Tuscarawas County Board of Elections

215 N.E.2d 698, 6 Ohio St. 2d 66, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 84, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 339
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1966·No. No. 40075·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The relator has failed to comply with statutory requirements as to his petition for candidate. The action of the board of elections in rejecting the petition was not an abuse of discretion or contrary to law. The writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

Taft, 0. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Reese v. Tuscarawas County Board of Elections, 215 N.E.2d 698, 6 Ohio St. 2d 66, 35 Ohio Op. 2d 84, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 339 (Ohio 1966).

215 N.E.2d 698 (State ex rel. Reese v. Tuscarawas County Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Schmelzer v. Board of Elections
440 N.E.2d 801 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1982)
State ex rel. Loss v. Board of Elections
281 N.E.2d 186 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
State ex rel. Wolson v. Kelly
215 N.E.2d 719 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1966)