State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell
This text of 289 P. 27 (State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.
In this case there are two counts in the information, alleging that relators, at different dates, in Snohomish county did unlawfully and feloniously carry about with them for the purpose of un *697 lawful sale a quantity of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, to wit, about five gallons of moonshine whisky.
For the reasons stated in the case of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
289 P. 27, 157 Wash. 696, 1930 Wash. LEXIS 931, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-reap-v-bell-wash-1930.