State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell

Washington Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell

289 P. 27, 157 Wash. 696, 1930 Wash. LEXIS 931

Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 4, 1930·No. No. 22568. Department Two.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.

In this case there are two counts in the information, alleging that relators, at different dates, in Snohomish county did unlawfully and feloniously carry about with them for the purpose of un *697 lawful sale a quantity of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, to wit, about five gallons of moonshine whisky.

For the reasons stated in the case of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a similar case to that of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, ante p. 279, 289 Pac. 25.

In this case there are two counts in the information, alleging that relators, at different dates, in Snohomish county did unlawfully and feloniously carry about with them for the purpose of un *697 lawful sale a quantity of intoxicating liquor, other than alcohol, to wit, about five gallons of moonshine whisky.

For the reasons stated in the case of State ex rel. Miller v. Bell, supra, the alternative writ is quashed and the peremptory writ denied.

State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell, 289 P. 27, 157 Wash. 696, 1930 Wash. LEXIS 931 (Wash. 1930).

Pincite

289 P. 27 (State Ex Rel. Reap v. Bell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related