State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 25, 1980
Docket80-215
StatusPublished

This text of State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District (State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District, (Mo. 1980).

Opinion

No. 80-215

I N THE SUPREME COURT O F THE STATE OF MONTANA

THE STATE O F MONTANA, ex r e l . , DAVID ERROL RASMUSSEN, a/k/a DAVID ERROL HENSRUD,

Relator,

THE D I S T R I C T COURT O F THE EIGHTEENTH J U D I C I A L D I S T R I C T , GALLATIN COUNTY, HON. J O S E P H B. GARY, D I S T R I C T JUDGE,

Respondent.

O R I G I N A L PROCEEDING:

For R e l a t o r :

A. M i c h a e l S a l v a g n i , B o z e m a n , Montana

For R e s p o n d e n t :

D o n a l d E. White, C o u n t y A t t o r n e y , B o z e m a n , M o n t a n a

S u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s : A u g u s t 8 , 1 9 8 0

Decided: AbG 2 5 1980 Filed: Mr. J u s t i c e Gene B . Daly d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e C o u r t .

R e l a t o r h a s f i l e d a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a w r i t of s u p e r -

v i s o r y c o n t r o l t o r e v i e w and r e v e r s e t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t ' s

d e n i a l of h i s motion t o d i s m i s s Count 11 of a n i n f o r m a t i o n

c h a r g i n g him w i t h a s s a u l t , a misdemeanor, i n v i o l a t i o n of

s e c t i o n 45-5-201 (1)( a ) , MCA. Count I of t h e i n f o r m a t i o n

c h a r g e s b u r g l a r y , a f e l o n y , i n v i o l a t i o n of s e c t i o n 45-6-

204 ( I ) , MCA.

The two c h a r g e s i n t h e i n f o r m a t i o n i n d i c a t e t h a t r e l a t o r

e n t e r e d t h e a p a r t m e n t of Robin L e s s l e y i n Bozeman, Montana,

f o r t h e p u r p o s e of r a n s a c k i n g i t , and w h i l e i n t h e a p a r t m e n t ,

h e h i t Robin L e s s l e y i n t h e f a c e t h r e e t i m e s w i t h h i s hand.

R e l a t o r c o n t e n d s t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t h a s no j u r i s d i c t i o n

t o t r y him f o r a misdemeanor, s i m p l e a s s a u l t . The S t a t e

contends t h a t t h e D i s t r i c t Court has j u r i s d i c t i o n t o t r y a

f e l o n y and a misdemeanor t o g e t h e r where t h e two a r e c o n n e c t e d

t o g e t h e r i n t h e i r commission. The q u e s t i o n i n t h i s c a s e ,

t h e r e f o r e , i s whether t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t h a s j u r i s d i c t i o n t o

t r y r e l a t o r f o r s i m p l e a s s a u l t , a misdemeanor.

J u r i s d i c t i o n of t h e D i s t r i c t and J u s t i c e C o u r t s o v e r

c r i m i n a l m a t t e r s depends on t h e maximum s e n t e n c e t h a t c a n be

imposed f o r committing t h e crime. Under s e c t i o n 3 - 5 - 3 0 2 ( 1 ) ,

MCA, t h e D i s t r i c t Court i s given o r i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n i n

a l l f e l o n y c r i m i n a l c a s e s and " a l l c a s e s of misdemeanor n o t

otherwise provided f o r . " The J u s t i c e C o u r t , on t h e o t h e r

hand, i s g i v e n c r i m i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n of a l l misdemeanors

p u n i s h a b l e by a f i n e n o t e x c e e d i n g $500 o r imprisonment n o t e x c e e d i n g s i x months o r b o t h . S e c t i o n 3-10-303(1), MCA.

The maximum s e n t e n c e f o r a p e r s o n c o n v i c t e d of a s s a u l t i s a f i n e n o t e x c e e d i n g $500 o r imprisonment n o t e x c e e d i n g s i x

months o r b o t h . S e c t i o n 45-5-201 ( 2 ) , MCA. Under s e c t i o n 46-11-404(1), MCA, "[aln . . . informa- tion . . . may c h a r g e two o r more d i f f e r e n t o f f e n s e s c o n n e c t e d

t o g e t h e r i n t h e i r commission." This s e c t i o n i s not a g r a n t

of j u r i s d i c t i o n b u t simply a permissive joinder s t a t u t e f o r

o f f e n s e s w i t h i n t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n of a g i v e n c o u r t . It is

p r o v i d e d t h a t j u r i s d i c t i o n f o r misdemeanor a s s a u l t l i e s w i t h

t h e J u s t i c e Court.

We, t h e r e f o r e , r e v e r s e the D i s t r i c t C o u r t ' s d e n i a l of

d i s m i s s a l of Count I1 and remand t o t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r

f u r t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s on Count I .

J/ J u s Ice

W e concur:

Z - ~ Q P G ~ Chief J u s t i c e

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rasmussen-v-district-mont-1980.