State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District
This text of State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District (State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 80-215
I N THE SUPREME COURT O F THE STATE OF MONTANA
THE STATE O F MONTANA, ex r e l . , DAVID ERROL RASMUSSEN, a/k/a DAVID ERROL HENSRUD,
Relator,
THE D I S T R I C T COURT O F THE EIGHTEENTH J U D I C I A L D I S T R I C T , GALLATIN COUNTY, HON. J O S E P H B. GARY, D I S T R I C T JUDGE,
Respondent.
O R I G I N A L PROCEEDING:
For R e l a t o r :
A. M i c h a e l S a l v a g n i , B o z e m a n , Montana
For R e s p o n d e n t :
D o n a l d E. White, C o u n t y A t t o r n e y , B o z e m a n , M o n t a n a
S u b m i t t e d on b r i e f s : A u g u s t 8 , 1 9 8 0
Decided: AbG 2 5 1980 Filed: Mr. J u s t i c e Gene B . Daly d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e C o u r t .
R e l a t o r h a s f i l e d a n a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a w r i t of s u p e r -
v i s o r y c o n t r o l t o r e v i e w and r e v e r s e t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t ' s
d e n i a l of h i s motion t o d i s m i s s Count 11 of a n i n f o r m a t i o n
c h a r g i n g him w i t h a s s a u l t , a misdemeanor, i n v i o l a t i o n of
s e c t i o n 45-5-201 (1)( a ) , MCA. Count I of t h e i n f o r m a t i o n
c h a r g e s b u r g l a r y , a f e l o n y , i n v i o l a t i o n of s e c t i o n 45-6-
204 ( I ) , MCA.
The two c h a r g e s i n t h e i n f o r m a t i o n i n d i c a t e t h a t r e l a t o r
e n t e r e d t h e a p a r t m e n t of Robin L e s s l e y i n Bozeman, Montana,
f o r t h e p u r p o s e of r a n s a c k i n g i t , and w h i l e i n t h e a p a r t m e n t ,
h e h i t Robin L e s s l e y i n t h e f a c e t h r e e t i m e s w i t h h i s hand.
R e l a t o r c o n t e n d s t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t h a s no j u r i s d i c t i o n
t o t r y him f o r a misdemeanor, s i m p l e a s s a u l t . The S t a t e
contends t h a t t h e D i s t r i c t Court has j u r i s d i c t i o n t o t r y a
f e l o n y and a misdemeanor t o g e t h e r where t h e two a r e c o n n e c t e d
t o g e t h e r i n t h e i r commission. The q u e s t i o n i n t h i s c a s e ,
t h e r e f o r e , i s whether t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t h a s j u r i s d i c t i o n t o
t r y r e l a t o r f o r s i m p l e a s s a u l t , a misdemeanor.
J u r i s d i c t i o n of t h e D i s t r i c t and J u s t i c e C o u r t s o v e r
c r i m i n a l m a t t e r s depends on t h e maximum s e n t e n c e t h a t c a n be
imposed f o r committing t h e crime. Under s e c t i o n 3 - 5 - 3 0 2 ( 1 ) ,
MCA, t h e D i s t r i c t Court i s given o r i g i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n i n
a l l f e l o n y c r i m i n a l c a s e s and " a l l c a s e s of misdemeanor n o t
otherwise provided f o r . " The J u s t i c e C o u r t , on t h e o t h e r
hand, i s g i v e n c r i m i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n of a l l misdemeanors
p u n i s h a b l e by a f i n e n o t e x c e e d i n g $500 o r imprisonment n o t e x c e e d i n g s i x months o r b o t h . S e c t i o n 3-10-303(1), MCA.
The maximum s e n t e n c e f o r a p e r s o n c o n v i c t e d of a s s a u l t i s a f i n e n o t e x c e e d i n g $500 o r imprisonment n o t e x c e e d i n g s i x
months o r b o t h . S e c t i o n 45-5-201 ( 2 ) , MCA. Under s e c t i o n 46-11-404(1), MCA, "[aln . . . informa- tion . . . may c h a r g e two o r more d i f f e r e n t o f f e n s e s c o n n e c t e d
t o g e t h e r i n t h e i r commission." This s e c t i o n i s not a g r a n t
of j u r i s d i c t i o n b u t simply a permissive joinder s t a t u t e f o r
o f f e n s e s w i t h i n t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n of a g i v e n c o u r t . It is
p r o v i d e d t h a t j u r i s d i c t i o n f o r misdemeanor a s s a u l t l i e s w i t h
t h e J u s t i c e Court.
We, t h e r e f o r e , r e v e r s e the D i s t r i c t C o u r t ' s d e n i a l of
d i s m i s s a l of Count I1 and remand t o t h e D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r
f u r t h e r p r o c e e d i n g s on Count I .
J/ J u s Ice
W e concur:
Z - ~ Q P G ~ Chief J u s t i c e
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. District, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-rasmussen-v-district-mont-1980.