State ex rel. Rankin v. Cyned Transport Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Rankin v. Cyned Transport Corp.

115 Ohio St. 3d 424

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 11, 2007·No. No. 2006-1249·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the Industrial Commission. Butkovich, Crosthwaite & Gast Co., L.P.A., Joseph A. Butkovich, and Robert E. Hof, for appellant. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Eric J. Tarbox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to the Industrial Commission. Butkovich, Crosthwaite & Gast Co., L.P.A., Joseph A. Butkovich, and Robert E. Hof, for appellant. Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Eric J. Tarbox, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio.

State ex rel. Rankin v. Cyned Transport Corp., 115 Ohio St. 3d 424 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

115 Ohio St. 3d 424 (State ex rel. Rankin v. Cyned Transport Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.