State ex rel. Range v. Saia

532 So. 2d 167, 1988 La. LEXIS 2303, 1988 WL 114976
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 28, 1988
DocketNo. 88-KH-2507
StatusPublished

This text of 532 So. 2d 167 (State ex rel. Range v. Saia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Range v. Saia, 532 So. 2d 167, 1988 La. LEXIS 2303, 1988 WL 114976 (La. 1988).

Opinion

In re Range, Warren J.; —Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory, remedial and mandamus writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 12-80-1044.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion he has filed for post conviction relief. Relator also represents that his application has been answered by the district attorney’s office and that he has filed a traverse to that answer. If relator’s representations are correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
532 So. 2d 167, 1988 La. LEXIS 2303, 1988 WL 114976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-range-v-saia-la-1988.