State ex rel. Radcliffe v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State ex rel. Radcliffe v. Kerr

732 P.2d 90, 83 Or. App. 522

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 4, 1987

Docket80-1733-E; CA A38239

StatusPublished

This text of 732 P.2d 90 (State ex rel. Radcliffe v. Kerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Radcliffe v. Kerr, 732 P.2d 90, 83 Or. App. 522 (Or. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from a trial court order holding her in criminal contempt for wilful violation of a visitation order. She was sentenced to serve 30 days in jail and fined $300. The sentence and the fine were suspended, and she was placed on 5-year probation. The dispositive issue is whether the order is sufficient. It is not. We reverse and remand.

Defendant contends, inter alia, that the order is insufficient, because it does not specifically identify the statutory basis on which it is entered. We agree. See ORS 33.020; State ex rel AFSD v. Burkhart, 80 Or App 681, 723 P2d 374 (1986).

Defendant’s other assignments of error lack merit.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI