State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections

670 N.E.2d 477, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 3, 1996

Docket96-2067

StatusPublished

This text of 670 N.E.2d 477 (State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections, 670 N.E.2d 477, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relators’ request for expedited oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for expedited oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and oral argument is set for October 8, 1996. Each side shall have fifteen minutes for oral argument.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relators’ request for expedited oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request for expedited oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and oral argument is set for October 8, 1996. Each side shall have fifteen minutes for oral argument.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

670 N.E.2d 477, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-purdy-v-clermont-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-1996.