State ex rel. Ptak v. Masheter

214 N.E.2d 806, 5 Ohio St. 2d 200, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 387, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 411

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1966·No. No. 39875·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Relators do not appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals so far as it relates to respondent Charles M. Yurick.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of State, ex rel. Braman, v. Masheter, Dir., 5 Ohio St. 2d 197.

Judgment affirmed.

Taet, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Ptak v. Masheter, 214 N.E.2d 806, 5 Ohio St. 2d 200, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 387, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 411 (Ohio 1966).

Pincite

214 N.E.2d 806 (State ex rel. Ptak v. Masheter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.