State ex rel. Ptak v. Masheter
214 N.E.2d 806, 5 Ohio St. 2d 200, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 387, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 411
This text of 214 N.E.2d 806 (State ex rel. Ptak v. Masheter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Ptak v. Masheter, 214 N.E.2d 806, 5 Ohio St. 2d 200, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 387, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 411 (Ohio 1966).
Opinion
Relators do not appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeals so far as it relates to respondent Charles M. Yurick.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of State, ex rel. Braman, v. Masheter, Dir., 5 Ohio St. 2d 197.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Braman v. Masheter
214 N.E.2d 804 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1966)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
214 N.E.2d 806, 5 Ohio St. 2d 200, 34 Ohio Op. 2d 387, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-ptak-v-masheter-ohio-1966.