State ex rel. Prunty v. Saferin

722 N.E.2d 523, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1488, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 79, 2000 WL 37774
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 19, 2000
Docket99-2053
StatusPublished

This text of 722 N.E.2d 523 (State ex rel. Prunty v. Saferin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Prunty v. Saferin, 722 N.E.2d 523, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1488, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 79, 2000 WL 37774 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On complaint in mandamus by Robert E. Prunty and on motion for summary judgment. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 N.E.2d 523, 87 Ohio St. 3d 1488, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 79, 2000 WL 37774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-prunty-v-saferin-ohio-2000.