State ex rel. Priestly v. State

558 So. 2d 558, 1990 La. LEXIS 625, 1990 WL 18660
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 2, 1990
DocketNo. 90-KH-0308
StatusPublished

This text of 558 So. 2d 558 (State ex rel. Priestly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Priestly v. State, 558 So. 2d 558, 1990 La. LEXIS 625, 1990 WL 18660 (La. 1990).

Opinion

In re Priestly, Wayne D.; — Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory, remedial and mandamus writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “I", No. 287-316.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of Boykin and sentencing transcripts he claims to have filed on or about October 13, 1989. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 So. 2d 558, 1990 La. LEXIS 625, 1990 WL 18660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-priestly-v-state-la-1990.