State Ex Rel. Price v. Callaway

79 So. 146, 16 Ala. App. 472, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 159
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided May 28, 1918·No. 8 Div. 594.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

An appeal is not authorized from a judgment of the court on demurrer, in a quo warranto proceeding, in advance of a final judgment of the court disposing of the ease. Section 2843, Code 1907, only authorized an appeal from the order of the judge of the court on the preliminary consideration of the petition (State ex rel. Crow v. Crook, Judge, 123 Ala. 657, 27 South. 334), while section 5470 provides for appeals from the final judgment of the court disposing of the case.

The judgment here merely sustains the demurrer to the complaint, and this court is without jurisdiction to review that order on this appeal.

A judgment will be entered, dismissing the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Price v. Callaway, 79 So. 146, 16 Ala. App. 472, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 159 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

79 So. 146 (State Ex Rel. Price v. Callaway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carruba v. Meeks
150 So. 2d 195 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Du Courneau v. Board of Com'rs
88 So. 27 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1920)