State Ex Rel. Price v. Callaway

Alabama Court of Appeals

State Ex Rel. Price v. Callaway

79 So. 146, 16 Ala. App. 472, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 159

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 28, 1918

Docket8 Div. 594.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 79 So. 146 (State Ex Rel. Price v. Callaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Price v. Callaway, 79 So. 146, 16 Ala. App. 472, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 159 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, P. J.

An appeal is not authorized from a judgment of the court on demurrer, in a quo warranto proceeding, in advance of a final judgment of the court disposing of the ease. Section 2843, Code 1907, only authorized an appeal from the order of the judge of the court on the preliminary consideration of the petition (State ex rel. Crow v. Crook, Judge, 123 Ala. 657, 27 South. 334), while section 5470 provides for appeals from the final judgment of the court disposing of the case.

The judgment here merely sustains the demurrer to the complaint, and this court is without jurisdiction to review that order on this appeal.

A judgment will be entered, dismissing the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI