State ex rel. Porter v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Porter v. State

249 So. 3d 826

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 3, 2018

DocketNo. 17-KH-0578

StatusPublished

This text of 249 So. 3d 826 (State ex rel. Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Porter v. State, 249 So. 3d 826 (La. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. See State v. Parker , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; State ex rel. Glover v. State , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Relator does not identify an illegal term in his sentence, and therefore, his filing is properly construed as an application for post-conviction relief. See State v. Parker , 98-0256 (La. 5/8/98), 711 So.2d 694. As such, it is subject to the time limitation set forth in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Relator's application was not timely filed in the district court, and he fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8 ; State ex rel. Glover v. State , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 So. 3d 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-porter-v-state-la-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack