State ex rel. Porter v. State

916 So. 2d 123, 2005 La. LEXIS 2711, 2005 WL 3591841
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 28, 2005·No. No. 2004-KH-2080·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In re Porter, Donald Roche; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 01-0327; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 04-KH-816.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied. Because the terms of the statute under which relator was sentenced do not include a prohibition on parole, see R.S. 14:68.4, the district court is directed to resentence relator to a term which does not include such a prohibition. Relator’s parole eligibility is to be determined by the Department of Corrections pursuant to R.S. 15:574.4. St. Amant v. 19th J.D.C., 94-0567 (La.9/3/96), 678 So.2d 536; cf. State ex rel. Simmons v. Stalder, 93-1852 (La.1/26/96), 666 So.2d 661.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Porter v. State, 916 So. 2d 123, 2005 La. LEXIS 2711, 2005 WL 3591841 (La. 2005).

916 So. 2d 123 (State ex rel. Porter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Mincey
12 So. 3d 1105 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
State v. Carter
976 So. 2d 196 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)
State v. Henry
966 So. 2d 692 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2007)
State v. Zeigler
945 So. 2d 946 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2006)