State ex rel. Pope v. Russo

2012 Ohio 5293
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 14, 2012
Docket98877
StatusPublished

This text of 2012 Ohio 5293 (State ex rel. Pope v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Pope v. Russo, 2012 Ohio 5293 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Pope v. Russo, 2012-Ohio-5293.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98877

STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JOHNATHAN POPE

RELATOR

vs.

HONORABLE JOHN J. RUSSO RESPONDENT

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 458919 Order No. 459677

RELEASE DATE: November 14, 2012 FOR RELATOR

Johnathan Pope, pro se Inmate No. 593209 Lake Erie Correctional Institution P.O. Box 8000 Conneaut, Ohio 44030

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J.:

{¶1} On August 29, 2012, the relator, Johnathan Pope, commenced this

mandamus action against the respondent, Judge John J. Russo, to compel the judge to rule

on his “pending motion(s) requesting a corrected entry of 9 additional days of jail time

credit.” (Demand for relief.) Pope had filed motions for additional jail-time credit in

the underlying case, State v. Pope, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-540082, on January 31, April

17, and July 10, 2012. Previously, the respondent judge had granted Pope 16 days of

jail-time credit. On September 26, 2012, the respondent, through the Cuyahoga County

Prosecutor, moved for summary judgment, inter alia, on the grounds of mootness.

Attached to this dispositive motion is a certified copy of a September 6, 2012 journal

entry, in which the judge granted Pope a total of 25 days of jail-time credit. Pope never

filed a response.

{¶2} The attached journal entry establishes that Pope has received his requested

relief, a ruling on his pending motions granting him additional jail-time credit. The court

further notes that after the judge issued the September 6 journal entry, the Ohio

Department of Rehabilitation and Correction updated its offender search page for Pope by

changing his release date from October 17, 2012, to October 7, 2012. Thus, this matter

is moot.

{¶3} Accordingly, this court grants the respondent’s motion for summary judgment

and denies the application for a writ of mandamus. Relator to pay costs. This court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry

upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied.

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE

KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 5293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pope-v-russo-ohioctapp-2012.