State ex rel. Pope v. Russo
This text of 2012 Ohio 5293 (State ex rel. Pope v. Russo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Pope v. Russo, 2012-Ohio-5293.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98877
STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. JOHNATHAN POPE
RELATOR
vs.
HONORABLE JOHN J. RUSSO RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Mandamus Motion No. 458919 Order No. 459677
RELEASE DATE: November 14, 2012 FOR RELATOR
Johnathan Pope, pro se Inmate No. 593209 Lake Erie Correctional Institution P.O. Box 8000 Conneaut, Ohio 44030
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor 8th Floor Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., P.J.:
{¶1} On August 29, 2012, the relator, Johnathan Pope, commenced this
mandamus action against the respondent, Judge John J. Russo, to compel the judge to rule
on his “pending motion(s) requesting a corrected entry of 9 additional days of jail time
credit.” (Demand for relief.) Pope had filed motions for additional jail-time credit in
the underlying case, State v. Pope, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-540082, on January 31, April
17, and July 10, 2012. Previously, the respondent judge had granted Pope 16 days of
jail-time credit. On September 26, 2012, the respondent, through the Cuyahoga County
Prosecutor, moved for summary judgment, inter alia, on the grounds of mootness.
Attached to this dispositive motion is a certified copy of a September 6, 2012 journal
entry, in which the judge granted Pope a total of 25 days of jail-time credit. Pope never
filed a response.
{¶2} The attached journal entry establishes that Pope has received his requested
relief, a ruling on his pending motions granting him additional jail-time credit. The court
further notes that after the judge issued the September 6 journal entry, the Ohio
Department of Rehabilitation and Correction updated its offender search page for Pope by
changing his release date from October 17, 2012, to October 7, 2012. Thus, this matter
is moot.
{¶3} Accordingly, this court grants the respondent’s motion for summary judgment
and denies the application for a writ of mandamus. Relator to pay costs. This court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry
upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶4} Writ denied.
FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., PRESIDING JUDGE
KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 5293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pope-v-russo-ohioctapp-2012.