State ex rel. Poore v. Mayer

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Poore v. Mayer

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 78

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 1, 1964

DocketNos. 38164, 38165 and 38237

StatusPublished

This text of 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 78 (State ex rel. Poore v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Poore v. Mayer, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 78 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

There is no question that the trial court, in the criminal proceeding, had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the person of accused. The court had the power to determine its own jurisdiction. Prohibition cannot be used to obtain an advance ruling as to the admissibility of evidence. Relator’s remedy is by way of appeal from an alleged erroneous ruling on the admissibility of the evidence.

Judgments affirmed.

Taut, C. J., Zimmerman, Kerns, 0’Neill, Griuuith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

There is no question that the trial court, in the criminal proceeding, had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of the person of accused. The court had the power to determine its own jurisdiction. Prohibition cannot be used to obtain an advance ruling as to the admissibility of evidence. Relator’s remedy is by way of appeal from an alleged erroneous ruling on the admissibility of the evidence.

Judgments affirmed.

Taut, C. J., Zimmerman, Kerns, 0’Neill, Griuuith and Herbert, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting by designation in the place and stead of Matthias, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-poore-v-mayer-ohio-1964.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack