State Ex Rel. Pohl v. Gayhart

68 P. 113, 26 Nev. 278
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 5, 1901·No. No. 1611.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

The only question in this case is whether relator took and subscribed to the official oath in conformity with law.

The facts are similar to those in the case ofState v. Van Patten, 26 Nev. 273, and upon the authority of that case a *Page 279 judgment of ouster will be entered against this respondent, with costs.

It is so ordered.

ON MOTION TO RETAX COSTS.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Pohl v. Gayhart, 68 P. 113, 26 Nev. 278 (Neb. 1901).

68 P. 113 (State Ex Rel. Pohl v. Gayhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zelavin v. Tonopah Belmont Development Co.
149 P. 188 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1915)