State Ex Rel. Pohl v. Gayhart
68 P. 113, 26 Nev. 278
Opinions
The only question in this case is whether relator took and subscribed to the official oath in conformity with law.
The facts are similar to those in the case ofState v. Van Patten,
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Ex Rel. Pohl v. Gayhart, 68 P. 113, 26 Nev. 278 (Neb. 1901).
68 P. 113 (State Ex Rel. Pohl v. Gayhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Zelavin v. Tonopah Belmont Development Co.
149 P. 188 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1915)