State ex rel. Poe v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Poe v. Indus. Comm.

2001 Ohio 1, 91 Ohio St. 3d 22

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 23, 2001

Docket2000-0680

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 1 (State ex rel. Poe v. Indus. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Poe v. Indus. Comm., 2001 Ohio 1, 91 Ohio St. 3d 22 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 22.]

THE STATE EX REL. POE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Poe v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-680—Submitted November 14, 2000—Decided January 24, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-142. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Plymale, for appellee Industrial Commission. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General; Dinsmore & Shohl L.L.P., and Michael L. Squillace, Special Counsel, for appellee Ohio State University. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 22.]

THE STATE EX REL. POE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as State ex rel. Poe v. Indus. Comm., 2001-Ohio-1.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-680—Submitted November 14, 2000—Decided January 24, 2001.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 99AP-142. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Philip J. Fulton & Associates and William A. Thorman III, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Stephen D. Plymale, for appellee Industrial Commission. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General; Dinsmore & Shohl L.L.P., and Michael L. Squillace, Special Counsel, for appellee Ohio State University. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 1, 91 Ohio St. 3d 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-poe-v-indus-comm-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack