State ex rel. Pirman v. Money

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Pirman v. Money

623 N.E.2d 86, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1402

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Pirman v. Money. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 Ohio St. 3d 591 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 1993·No. 93-2347·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and/or habeas corpus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for stay be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective December 2, 1993.

Douglas and Weight, JJ., would also dismiss the cause. Resnick, J., would also deny the writs on the merits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Habeas Corpus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and/or habeas corpus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for stay be, and the same is hereby, denied, effective December 2, 1993.

Douglas and Weight, JJ., would also dismiss the cause. Resnick, J., would also deny the writs on the merits.

State ex rel. Pirman v. Money, 623 N.E.2d 86, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 1993).

Pincite

623 N.E.2d 86 (State ex rel. Pirman v. Money) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.