State ex rel. Piotrowski v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Piotrowski v. Industrial Commission

728 N.E.2d 377, 88 Ohio St. 3d 556

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 31, 2000

DocketNo. 98-2519

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 728 N.E.2d 377 (State ex rel. Piotrowski v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Piotrowski v. Industrial Commission, 728 N.E.2d 377, 88 Ohio St. 3d 556 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Mandamus cannot issue when there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. Berger v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 28, 6 OBR 50, 451 N.E.2d 225. In this case, claimant had numerous opportunities to appeal orders denying her a change of election. Instead, she responded by repeatedly refiling the same motion, which only complicated further an already convoluted administrative path.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI