State ex rel. Pinkney v. Goldsmith's Adm'r
1 H. & J. 101
Opinion
The Couiit., on motion of the defendant by his attorney, ordered the sheriff to correct his return, and the sheriff’s return yvas accordingly corrected to pulla bona.
Note. The judgment was considered as a judgment of assets in futuro; and that there should have been a scire facias, suggesting assets, if any had pome to, or were in the hands of the administrator.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Pinkney v. Goldsmith's Adm'r, 1 H. & J. 101 (Va. Super. Ct. 1800).
1 H. & J. 101 (State ex rel. Pinkney v. Goldsmith's Adm'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.