State ex rel. Pinkney v. Goldsmith's Adm'r
1 H. & J. 101
This text of 1 H. & J. 101 (State ex rel. Pinkney v. Goldsmith's Adm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Pinkney v. Goldsmith's Adm'r, 1 H. & J. 101 (Va. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
The Couiit., on motion of the defendant by his attorney, ordered the sheriff to correct his return, and the sheriff’s return yvas accordingly corrected to pulla bona.
Note. The judgment was considered as a judgment of assets in futuro; and that there should have been a scire facias, suggesting assets, if any had pome to, or were in the hands of the administrator.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 H. & J. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pinkney-v-goldsmiths-admr-vagensess-1800.