State ex rel. Pigott v. Porter

Montana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Pigott v. Porter

189 P. 619, 57 Mont. 539, 1920 Mont. LEXIS 62

Montana Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1920·No. No. 4,593·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The state efficiency and trade commission employed William T. Pigott to prepare the proposed legislative bills deemed necessary to carry out the recommendations of the commission. In all other respects the facts involved herein are identical with the facts presented in State ex rel. Pew v. Porter, ante, p. 535, 189 Pac. 618. Upon the authority of that case the motion to quash is overruled, and the peremptory writ is directed to issue forthwith.

Associate Justices Hurdy, Matthews and Cooper concur. Mr. Chief Justice Brantdy, being absent, takes no part in the foregoing decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. JUSTICE HOLLOWAY

delivered the opinion of the court.

The state efficiency and trade commission employed William T. Pigott to prepare the proposed legislative bills deemed necessary to carry out the recommendations of the commission. In all other respects the facts involved herein are identical with the facts presented in State ex rel. Pew v. Porter, ante, p. 535, 189 Pac. 618. Upon the authority of that case the motion to quash is overruled, and the peremptory writ is directed to issue forthwith.

Associate Justices Hurdy, Matthews and Cooper concur. Mr. Chief Justice Brantdy, being absent, takes no part in the foregoing decision.

State ex rel. Pigott v. Porter, 189 P. 619, 57 Mont. 539, 1920 Mont. LEXIS 62 (Mo. 1920).

Pincite

189 P. 619 (State ex rel. Pigott v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related