State ex rel. Piesciuk v. Young

859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 27, 2006
Docket2006-1999
StatusPublished

This text of 859 N.E.2d 555 (State ex rel. Piesciuk v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Piesciuk v. Young, 859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2006).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On respondents’ motion to dismiss and relator’s motion for issuance of [1416]*1416peremptory writ. Motion to dismiss granted. Motion for issuance of peremptory writ denied. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-piesciuk-v-young-ohio-2006.