State ex rel. Piesciuk v. Young

859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2006·No. 2006-1999·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On respondents’ motion to dismiss and relator’s motion for issuance of [1416] peremptory writ. Motion to dismiss granted. Motion for issuance of peremptory writ denied. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Piesciuk v. Young, 859 N.E.2d 555, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1415 (Ohio 2006).

859 N.E.2d 555 (State ex rel. Piesciuk v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.