State ex rel. Pierson v. Douglass

33 N.J.L. 363
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 15, 1869·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

Two questions are submitted to the judgment of the court.

First. Whether the loss of general poll tax must fall upon the county and state.

Second. Whether a peremptory mandamus should issue to the city receiver to pay the special poll tax to the county [365]*365collector, admitting that it has not been, and cannot be collected by the city.

The application fora mandamus not being based upon the refusal or neglect on the part of the city receiver of taxes to employ all proper and lawful means at his command to collect the special tax in question, it will be presumed for the purposes of this case, that the city receiver is in no fault in that respect.

At the time of the passage of the act authorizing this special poll tax, February 28th, 1865, the general lax laws of this state did not. give to the general county and state quotas the right of priority in payment.

It was the duty of the township collector to pay the county and state taxes to the county collector, from time to time, as he received them. Nix. Nig. 941, § 24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Pierson v. Douglass, 33 N.J.L. 363 (N.J. 1869).

33 N.J.L. 363 (State ex rel. Pierson v. Douglass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.