State ex rel. Pierson v. Douglass

33 N.J.L. 363
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 15, 1869
StatusPublished

This text of 33 N.J.L. 363 (State ex rel. Pierson v. Douglass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Pierson v. Douglass, 33 N.J.L. 363 (N.J. 1869).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Van Syckel, J.

Two questions are submitted to the judgment of the court.

First. Whether the loss of general poll tax must fall upon the county and state.

Second. Whether a peremptory mandamus should issue to the city receiver to pay the special poll tax to the county [365]*365collector, admitting that it has not been, and cannot be collected by the city.

The application fora mandamus not being based upon the refusal or neglect on the part of the city receiver of taxes to employ all proper and lawful means at his command to collect the special tax in question, it will be presumed for the purposes of this case, that the city receiver is in no fault in that respect.

At the time of the passage of the act authorizing this special poll tax, February 28th, 1865, the general lax laws of this state did not. give to the general county and state quotas the right of priority in payment.

It was the duty of the township collector to pay the county and state taxes to the county collector, from time to time, as he received them. Nix. Nig. 941, § 24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 N.J.L. 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pierson-v-douglass-nj-1869.