State ex rel. Pickrel v. Industrial Commission

539 N.E.2d 623, 43 Ohio St. 3d 128, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 102
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 7, 1989
DocketNo. 88-671
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 539 N.E.2d 623 (State ex rel. Pickrel v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Pickrel v. Industrial Commission, 539 N.E.2d 623, 43 Ohio St. 3d 128, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 102 (Ohio 1989).

Opinions

Moyer, C.J.

Appellant claims an automatic entitlement to an award equal to the statewide average weekly wage at the time of her husband’s death. We disagree with appellant’s interpretation of R.C. 4123.59(B) and hereby affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

R.C. 4123.59(B) establishes that weekly death benefits to wholly dependent persons “shall be sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the average weekly wage * * *,” subject to a statutory maximum and minimum.1 By focusing exclusively on the statutory maximum, appellant ignores what we perceive to be the mandatory formula for the computation of weekly death benefits.

As a predicate to relief in mandamus, it must be shown that; (1) relator has a clear legal right to the relief requested, (2) respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the act sought, and (3) relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law. State, ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc., v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42, 15 O.O. 3d 53, 399 N.E. 2d 81, paragraph one of the syllabus. In the present case, we find that the commission properly applied R.C. 4123.59(B) in determining the amount of death benefits due appellant. Appellant thus has failed to establish a clear legal right to the relief requested.

Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of mandamus is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Holmes, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur. Sweeney, Douglas and Res-nick, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. King v. Industrial Commission
99 Ohio St. 3d 85 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)
State ex rel. Maynard v. Indus. Comm.
2002 Ohio 6319 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)
State ex rel. Maynard v. Industrial Commission
779 N.E.2d 210 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
539 N.E.2d 623, 43 Ohio St. 3d 128, 1989 Ohio LEXIS 102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-pickrel-v-industrial-commission-ohio-1989.