State ex rel Picard v. Rost

47 La. Ann. 65
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 1, 1895
DocketNo. 11,600
StatusPublished

This text of 47 La. Ann. 65 (State ex rel Picard v. Rost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel Picard v. Rost, 47 La. Ann. 65 (La. 1895).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nicholls, O. J.

The pleadings and issues in this case are similar to those in the case of State of Louisiana ex rel. B. J. Kuhlman vs. Emile Rost, Judge, et al., No. 11,599, ante, p. 53. The decision in that case controls the present one.

For the reasons therein assigned, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the writ of prohibition which issued in the present matter be perpetuated, and that the injunction granted by the Judge of the Twenty-first Judicial District Court of the State of Louisiana, for the parish of St. Charles, in the matter of R. P. LeSassier vs. A. E. Picard, No. 78 on the docket of that court, be and the same is hereby set aside and discharged.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 La. Ann. 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-picard-v-rost-la-1895.