State ex rel. PFC Lamont Hill Memorial v. Petro

852 N.E.2d 1210, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1460
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 23, 2006·No. 2006-0910·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. On respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on pleadings, relator’s motions for leave to amend the caption of the complaint, to strike motion for judgment on the pleadings, and to disqualify Jennifer L. Urban from representing respondent, and respondent’s motion to strike relator’s motions to amend complaint, to strike, and to disqualify counsel. Relator’s motion for leave to amend the caption of the complaint is granted. Relator’s motions to strike and to disqualify counsel are denied. Respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. PFC Lamont Hill Memorial v. Petro, 852 N.E.2d 1210, 110 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2006).

852 N.E.2d 1210 (State ex rel. PFC Lamont Hill Memorial v. Petro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.