State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas

2012 Ohio 5423

Opinion

[Cite as State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2012-Ohio-5423.]

Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98699

STATE OF OHIO EX REL., TIMOTHY PETTWAY RELATOR

vs.

CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ET AL. RESPONDENTS

JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED

Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 457494 Order No. 460062

RELEASE DATE: November 20, 2012 FOR RELATOR

Timothy Pettway, Pro Se Inmate No. 550-655 Toledo Correctional Institution P.O. Box 80033 2001 East Central Avenue Toledo, OH 43608

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

BY: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center, 9th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113

MELODY J. STEWART, P.J.:

{¶1} Timothy Pettway has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo. Pettway

seeks an order from this court, which requires Judge Deena Calabrese and the Cuyahoga

County Court of Common Pleas to render a ruling with regard to a motion to “remand

sentencing for the limited purpose of allowing defendant to move trial court for a waiver

of payment of court costs” as filed in State v. Pettway, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-498474.

Judge Calabrese and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas have filed a motion

for summary judgment, which is granted. {¶2} Pettway’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot. Attached to the motion

for summary judgment is a copy of a judgment entry, as journalized on June 30, 2012,

which demonstrates that Pettway’s motion to “remand sentencing for the limited purpose

of allowing defendant to move trial court for a waiver of payment of court costs” was

denied. Thus, Pettway’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot. State ex rel.

Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278,

1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Snider v. Stapleton, 65 Ohio St.3d 40, 600

N.E.2d 240 (1992); State ex rel. Richard v. Wells, 64 Ohio St.3d 76, 591 N.E.2d 1240

(1992); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).

{¶3} Accordingly, we grant the motion for summary judgment. Respondents to pay

costs. Costs ordered waived. The court directs the clerk for the Eighth District Court of

Appeals to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the

journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied.

MELODY J. STEWART, PRESIDING JUDGE

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., and SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR