State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas

2012 Ohio 5423
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided November 21, 2012·No. 98699·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98699

STATE OF OHIO EX REL.,

TIMOTHY PETTWAY

RELATOR

vs.

CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF

COMMON PLEAS, ET AL.

RESPONDENTS

JUDGMENT:

WRIT DENIED

Writ of Procedendo

Motion No. 457494

Order No. 460062

RELEASE DATE: November 20, 2012

FOR RELATOR

Timothy Pettway, Pro Se Inmate No. 550-655 Toledo Correctional Institution P.O. Box 80033 2001 East Central Avenue Toledo, OH 43608

ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENTS

Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor

BY: James E. Moss Assistant County Prosecutor The Justice Center, 9th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113

MELODY J. STEWART, P.J.:

{¶1} Timothy Pettway has filed a complaint for a writ of procedendo. Pettway seeks an order from this court, which requires Judge Deena Calabrese and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to render a ruling with regard to a motion to “remand sentencing for the limited purpose of allowing defendant to move trial court for a waiver of payment of court costs” as filed in State v. Pettway, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-498474. Judge Calabrese and the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas have filed a motion for summary judgment, which is granted.

{¶2} Pettway’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot. Attached to the motion for summary judgment is a copy of a judgment entry, as journalized on June 30, 2012, which demonstrates that Pettway’s motion to “remand sentencing for the limited purpose of allowing defendant to move trial court for a waiver of payment of court costs” was denied. Thus, Pettway’s request for a writ of procedendo is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723; State ex rel. Snider v. Stapleton, 65 Ohio St.3d 40, 600 N.E.2d 240 (1992); State ex rel. Richard v. Wells, 64 Ohio St.3d 76, 591 N.E.2d 1240 (1992); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).

{¶3} Accordingly, we grant the motion for summary judgment. Respondents to pay costs. Costs ordered waived. The court directs the clerk for the Eighth District Court of Appeals to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).

{¶4} Writ denied.

MELODY J. STEWART, PRESIDING JUDGE

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., and SEAN C. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2012 Ohio 5423 (Ohio Ct. App. 2012).

2012 Ohio 5423 (State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Price v. Berger
2023 Ohio 4661 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
State ex rel. Mays v. McCormick
2017 Ohio 7891 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2017)