Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

795 N.E.2d 680, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1541
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 2003
Docket2003-0860
StatusPublished

This text of 795 N.E.2d 680 (State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 795 N.E.2d 680, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1541 (Ohio 2003).

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 02AP-591, 152 Ohio App.3d 345, 2003-0hio-1654. Discretionary appeal allowed and motion for admission pro hac vice of Donald Ayer, Daniel Bromberg, and Jack Campbell by Jeffrey Jones granted.

Pfeifer, J., would grant the motion for admission pro hac vice but deny the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
787 N.E.2d 717 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 N.E.2d 680, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1541, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-petro-v-rj-reynolds-tobacco-co-ohio-2003.