State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

795 N.E.2d 680, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1541
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 Ohio St. 3d 559
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 10, 2003·No. 2003-0860·Published

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 02AP-591, 152 Ohio App.3d 345, 2003-0hio-1654. Discretionary appeal allowed and motion for admission pro hac vice of Donald Ayer, Daniel Bromberg, and Jack Campbell by Jeffrey Jones granted.

Pfeifer, J., would grant the motion for admission pro hac vice but deny the discretionary appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 795 N.E.2d 680, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1541 (Ohio 2003).

795 N.E.2d 680 (State ex rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Petro v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
787 N.E.2d 717 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2003)