State ex rel. Petro v. Mercomp, Inc.

859 N.E.2d 560, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1422
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2006·No. 2006-1422·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 86563, 167 Ohio App.3d 64, 2006-Ohio-2729. Reported at 111 Ohio St.3d 1469, 2006-Ohio-5625, 855 N.E.2d 1258. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents and would grant the motion and accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II. Lundberg Stratton and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion and accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Petro v. Mercomp, Inc., 859 N.E.2d 560, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1422 (Ohio 2006).

859 N.E.2d 560 (State ex rel. Petro v. Mercomp, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Petro v. Mercomp, Inc.
853 N.E.2d 1193 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)