State ex rel. Petillo v. Marion County Criminal Court

Indiana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Petillo v. Marion County Criminal Court

121 N.E.2d 734, 233 Ind. 700, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 275

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 1954·No. No. 0-387·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam

Relator files what he designates as a verified motion to be granted an appeal from the Marion County Criminal Court, Division One, from a judgment entered August 9, 1954, denying his petition for a writ of error eoram nobis filed in the trial court. Rule 2-40 provides an appeal may be prosecuted in such matters within ninety days after the day of the decision.

If relator has merit to his appeal, and he is a pauper as he alleges, it is the duty of the Public Defender to prosecute it, and the relator should bring the matter to his attention.

The motion is dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 121 N. E. 2d 734.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Relator files what he designates as a verified motion to be granted an appeal from the Marion County Criminal Court, Division One, from a judgment entered August 9, 1954, denying his petition for a writ of error eoram nobis filed in the trial court. Rule 2-40 provides an appeal may be prosecuted in such matters within ninety days after the day of the decision.

If relator has merit to his appeal, and he is a pauper as he alleges, it is the duty of the Public Defender to prosecute it, and the relator should bring the matter to his attention.

The motion is dismissed.

Note. — Reported in 121 N. E. 2d 734.

State ex rel. Petillo v. Marion County Criminal Court, 121 N.E.2d 734, 233 Ind. 700, 1954 Ind. LEXIS 275 (Ind. 1954).

Pincite

121 N.E.2d 734 (State ex rel. Petillo v. Marion County Criminal Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.